Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 August 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You need to work out a way to resize the second image as it is too large for the article - asking at our Live Help Chat is a good idea and you can get some good help and advice there. Secondly, I think you should try and add sections to the article, such as
==Early life==

Which creates a section with 'Early Life' as the name. If you have any more questions, please send me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chevymontecarlo 05:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is linked with several other articles and the layout was done according to the guidelines i found on wikipedia. why does it still say the article needs to be 'wikified'? thanks for you help!

~~Xiaomai2 (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think so now following your improvements. The boxes at the top (or 'tags') do not go away automatically - they need to be manually removed. I'll remove both tags for you, since I'm going to provide a brief review/a few comments as well. It's definitely an interesting article, but try and add more reliable references if you can - see WP:CITE for more information. Chevymontecarlo 05:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking feedback on new article on Bled eConference. It's an IS related international conference with 23 year old tradition. Also hoping for additional sources. Thanks in advance for the support. ~~Mbabnik (talk) 08:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipedians, I have created a article titled National Waterway 4 (NW-4). I have just posted a Draft article on WP. User:Sodabottle has suggested copy edit for improving the article. I'm also working on the copy editing part. I request our wikipedians to review and provide your valuable Comments / feedback to improve the article. It will help me creating similar articles for 5 other National Waterways in India. ----Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 09:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know any comments about my entry before I go live. Any input greatly appreciated.


Sfmarketing (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bejinhan's comments Bejinhan talks 13:21, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your references are: Legal 500, 2009 and Chambers and Partners, 2010. Do you have online/book/news sources that you can cite? Please use the relevant citation templates.
Semple Fraser is a commercial law firm, offering advice across a range of areas throughout the UK. Founded in 1990, the firm has 24 Partners and a total staff complement of 150 people with offices in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Manchester.
The firm's main areas of practice are banking & finance, commercial litigation, construction, corporate, corporate recovery & insolvency, employment, environment & pollution, intellectual property, planning, real estate and tax.
At the heart of the firm's business philosophy is to focus on key industry sectors - Construction, Digital Economy, Finance, Life Sciences, Real Estate, Renewables and Energy, and Waste.

User:Martin Dimitrov/Tenable Network Security

[edit]

Your feedback on notability and objectivity would be appreciated Tenable Network Security.

Martin Dimitrov (talk) 17:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be the place to Request Feedback. Thank you!

Negovori (talk) 17:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page for current Off-Broadway show. Previously didn't exist. Please advise (it's also my first ever self-created page!)

Cheers


LexWalk (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is my first article and I feel I have extrememly credible sources and a NPOV. I do work for this company but have found this process enjoyable and would like to continue. Are there ways to improve this that you see? My goal is to start adding pictures next. Thank you in advance, M


ColorMeHappy (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article has been deleted. Bejinhan talks 13:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please can someone review this well referenced article for publication? Many thanks for spending the time.

Update #1: I just tried to publish the page by trying to 'move' it from 'User:Iamthedigitalmonkey/FASHIONAIR' to 'FASHIONAIR'. However it did not work and a warning message was displayed saying 'User:Iamthedigitalmonkey/FASHIONAIR" cannot be moved to "FASHIONAIR", because the title "FASHIONAIR" is on the title blacklist.'

I double checked and there is not already a page with this name. I don't understand how/why this page is on the blacklist. If someone could advise me it would be very helpful. thanks

Iamthedigitalmonkey (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get the image link to work... What is the next step for this page to go live? I think I have done everything that I was told to in order to get this piece live.


Austinlyman (talk) 22:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in June, and it looks like it was edited by one editor, but it still says new unreviewed article. I would love some feedback. Thank you!


Allisonk45 (talk) 22:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found another source and removed some uncredible information and would appreciate it if the article could be looked at again. Thanks.


Dgbail09 (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i've added an initial page for the Half Moon Caye National Monument bird sanctuary island of Belize. i'm sure to have made some formatting errors, if so - apologies in advance. --jz


Jazy510 (talk) 23:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the reference formatting a little, please see this edit. Note that a) I used the external link format of [http://www.foo.com/baa baz] - which links the word 'baz' to the website; also b) I 'named' the reference, as the same one was used twice. See WP:CITE for more on that.
However, currently it only has one reference, and articles need more than one - to establish the notability. It needs independent reliable sources, or it may not survive as a live article. See also WP:VRS.
Do not worry too much about the formatting - anyone can help you fix that; the key issue is good references.  Chzz  ►  00:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted my article to be reviewed.


Andy (talk) 23:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]