Science desk
< June 30	<< Jun \| July \| Aug >>	July 2 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

July 1

Lexell's Comet

I just read the Lexell's Comet article that's currently on the Main Page, and I was confused by the conclusion. In a 2018 paper (DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab1f6), a team examined four asteroids and evaluated whether they could be the remains of the comet; one had a 99.2% chance of being the comet, one had a 74% chance, and the other two had less than 1%. Mathematically, how does this work? Isn't this saying that there's a 173% chance of one of the first two being the comet? I can't imagine such a basic mistake getting past peer-reviewers, so I'm guessing I've misunderstood something. Maybe they said that it broke in pieces, and therefore both of those asteroids could be parts of it? Nyttend (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Probability#Not_mutually_exclusive_events. You have to subtract the probability that both are remains of the comet, which comes to 0.992×0.74 = 0.734 (assuming the probabilities are independent). Hence the probability that one or the other (or both) are remains is 99.8%. --Wrongfilter (talk) 12:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]