Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 July 18
Appearance
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< July 17 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | Current desk > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
July 18
[edit]Functions whose every derivative is positive growing slower than exponential
[edit]Is there any smooth function with the following two properties:
, i.e. the nth derivative of f is strictly positive for every x and n.
for every b > 1. The hard case is when b is small.
Functions like (for a > 1) are the only ones I can think of with the first property, but none of them has the second property because you can always choose b < a. So I am asking whether there is any function with the first property that grows slower than exponential.
120.21.218.123 (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wouldn't any power series with positive coefficients that decrease compared to the coefficients of the exponential do? The exponential is , so e.g. should do the trick. The next question is whether you can find a closed-form expression for this or a similar power series. --Wrongfilter (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Good thinking. It is of course the case that the first property holds for any power series where all coefficients are positive. Plotting on a graph, I think your specific example doesn't satisfy the second property, but others where the coefficients decrease more rapidly do. 120.21.218.123 (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- --Lambiam 13:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- A half-exponential function will satisfy your requirements. Hellmuth Kneser famously defined an analytic function that is the functional square root of the exponential function.[1] --Lambiam 14:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Hellmuth Kneser (1950). "Reelle analytische Lösungen der Gleichung und verwandter Funktionalgleichungen". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 187: 56–67.
- A variant of Wrongfilter's idea that I think does work:
- (taking to be ).
- Numerical evidence suggests that One might therefore hope that would also work. However, its second derivative is negative for --Lambiam 22:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- And some higher derivatives are negative for even larger values of x. The eighth derivative is negative for , for instance. 120.21.79.62 (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The fourteenth derivative is negative for . That's as high as WolframAlpha will let me go. 120.21.79.62 (talk) 06:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, shifting the graph along the x-axis by using won't help. --Lambiam 11:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)