Language desk
< May 18	<< Apr \| May \| Jun >>	Current desk >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

May 19

L M N & R as semivowels?

In John Baret's 1574 dictionary An Alvearie he claims that the letters L M N & R are semivowels.

his commentary on L
his commentary on M
his commentary on N
his commentary on R

His reasoning (as I interpret it) is that in order to produce the L M N & R sounds one must voice the schwa vowel while having the tongue and lips in different positions. L is the schwa vowel + pressing tongue to upper teeth, M is the schwa vowel + closed lips, etc.

Does his reasoning have relevancy or validity in our present day understanding of semivowels? And are his views worth mentioning in the semivowels article? --78.9.139.5 (talk) 08:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baret's terminology is just following the terminological tradition of Greek antiquity, inherited from Aristotle, who used "hemiphona" ("semivowels") as a cover term for all continuant (non-plosive) consonants, including what we would call fricatives, nasals, liquids and approximants. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I think I understand now. Thank you for your answer! --78.9.139.5 (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

78.9.139.5 -- I haven't followed the links, but in that usage, "semi-vowel" basically means "consonant which can be pronounced syllabically". In the names of the letters of the Roman alphabet, the vowel letters (A E I O V) were named by their own sounds (i.e. [a] [e] [i] [o] [u]), the consonant letters that could not be pronounced syllabically (B C D G H K P Q T) were usually given names of the corresponding consonant sounds + "e" (i.e. [be], [ke], [de] etc., except that K only occurred before A and Q before V, so these two were given the names [ka] and [ku]), while the letters that could be pronounced syllabically (F L M N R S) were either given syllabic consonant names (i.e. [f] [l] [m] [n] [r] [s]) or names preceded by "e" (i.e. [ef] [el] [em] [en] [er] [es]). The name of X was derived from that of S... AnonMoos (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AnonMoos -- In the 4 links to pages I provided the author is referring to the sounds the letters make, not to the names of the letters. Though thanks for that bit of trivia! I've now learned something I never thought to ask about. Cheers! --78.9.139.5 (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I got bogged down in details, but my attempted point was that originally the names of letters of the Latin alphabet were formed in 3 different ways, depending on whether the main sound written by the letter was a vowel, "semi-vowel", or full consonant... AnonMoos (talk) 01:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but it is only those specific 4 letters that the author calls 'semivowels' so FPaS's answer seems cogent. --78.9.139.5 (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]