Computing desk
< June 12	<< May \| June \| Jul >>	June 14 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

June 13

Why are some YouTube links blacklisted and some not?

What is the difference between a YouTube addresses that contains 'feature=youtu.be' and the usual ones? The former may appear also as going to site youtu.be. And why is that one blacklisted by Wikipedia and the others not?

Here are examples:

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBpBNr6tj8Y example 1] not blacklisted (example 1)
[https://youtu.be/zBpBNr6tj8Y example 2] blacklisted
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBpBNr6tj8Y&feature=youtu.be example 3] not blacklisted (example 3)

Note: because Preview doesn't tell you a link is blacklisted I had to save several times. Apologies for that.

Contact Basemetal here 11:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The justification given for this global blacklisting (see m:Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2010-12#Youtu.be) is that URL redirection/shortening sites are redundant and can be used to circumvent existing blocks. This is consistent with WP:EL#Redirection sites, which says that "URL redirection sites are not to be used on Wikipedia". Some discussion of this can be found at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/December_2011#youtu.be —Noiratsi (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is the domain only, not special links on the webservers. See "www.youtube.com" and "youtu.be". --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 11:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GoPro HERO 4 wifi streaming and getting internet at the same time

When you connect your computer to a GoPro HERO 4 via wifi to stream from it, can you still connect to your home wifi network to get the internet? In other word, if I want to stream from the GoPro HERO 4 and get internet via wifi at the same time, would I need to have two separate wifi adapters on my computer? I don't have GoPro HERO 4 yet so I can't test it out myself. My other car is a cadr (talk) 11:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wi Fi supports more than one device. So it should be possible. However does your internet connection have enough capacity? A HD stream uses a lot of bandwidth going out from home, and many of these home internet services have a limited bandwidth for uploads. So if you overload it it will be very slow for other uses. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Wi Fi supports more than one device" is a very ambiguous statement. You can obviously have a large number of devices on one wifi network but typically most devices/computers with one wifi adapter can only be connected to one wifi network at a time. I don't have a go pro but I have a canon camera that has wifi, it has 2 modes, it has ad hoc mode where you can connect directly to it (from a computer or phone/tablet) bit it also has a "network mode" where you first connect the camera to a wifi network and then a computer or phone on the same network (with the canon software) can connect to the camera. Maybe the go pro has a similar feature? having a very cursory browse, it looks like that might not be the case, i think gopro just creates its own adhoc network. Vespine (talk) 22:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Encryption energy

If the WMF switch from HTTP to HTTPS is considered as a hypothetical, how much more energy would be consumed by HTTPS in a year (clients, transmission, and servers) compared with HTTP? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The impact, nowadays, is likely to be pretty trivial (see this blog post from 2010 by Google's Adam Langley). For some actual figures you could take a look at this 2003 research paper from Princeton: http://palms.ee.princeton.edu/PALMSopen/potlapally03analyzing.pdf —Noiratsi (talk) 22:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can gather from the raw data linked from wikitech:Analytics/Data/Pagecounts-all-sites, all WMF wikis combined get a bit less than 10,000 connections per second, totalling a bit under 250 MB of transferred data per second. The blog post that Noiratsi linked says "Modern hardware can perform 1500 handshakes/second/core" (for RSA-1024, in 2010), and AES instruction set links a claim of 3.5 cycles/byte (i.e., around 1 GB per second) for authenticated AES encryption (also in 2010). So I'd guesstimate that the WMF's SSL overhead could be handled by the equivalent of one additional server, roughly. -- BenRG (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! There is an information theoretic minimum too ^ref which would be even more negligible. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC).[reply]