Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Redirect Archives/March 2006

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 1

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. The majority (8 against 5) wants to delete the redirect and the policy (WP:SELF) supports this; furthermore, the article does not mention that it's the one millionth article, and the strawpoll on the talk page indicates that that is not going to change. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post scriptum: Combining with the discussion for the redirect at One million articles (nominated on 2 March), I count 10 editors arguing for deletion (cesarb, Ziggurat, BrokenSegue, P199, Pavel Vozenilek, Cryptic, Grocer, Chick Bowen, bodgan, Whouk) and 8 that it be kept (Kappa, Johntex, Kilo-Lima, Clarkefreak, Zocky, God of War, lancaddy, Moa3333). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was Category not redirect & speedy deleted by R3m0t. -- JLaTondre 20:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
All three nominated redirects were deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

March 2

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 7, '06 [17:17] <freakofnurxture|talk>
Question: Can you show me where this was decided? Sorry if I have restarted this issue. --Fang Aili
Where what was decided? No-self reference? That has been policy for as long as I can remember. See WP:SELF. Also, Wikipedia:Redirect says that a redirect should be deleted if "It is a cross-space redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace." This issue has never been controversial there is nothing to start. The policy is pritty cut and dry (at least, I hope you don't start some thing, it'd annoy me if yet another policy that I agree came under attack). BrokenSegue 01:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, ok. I was just asking. I was not familiar with that policy. --Fang Aili 14:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep and Strongest Objection. That redirect does no harm in anyway that I can see. I don´t think that any article is going to be written with that title. It is quite usefull and easy to use (a official goal of Wikipedia) for new and old users. I also object how the whole matter is being dealt by over-eager users. You listed that re-direct in this list, that is true (see below), but as two users showed that they did not agree, you simply ignored their view and deleted the re-direct anyway. This is not a shootinglist where someone announces that he going to kill a wild animal and then does it regardless of everything. This is place where someone asks for the opinion of other users and tries to reach a agreement. Therefore I must most strongly object the deletion of this redirect and also your behaviour. Flamarande 18:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep and Strong Objection. What that guy said. ^^^^^^^ Recon0 20:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See above ^^^ Dtm142 01:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This might be an instance of WP:IAR. There's at least one precedent for it: List of admins redirects to Wikipedia:List of administrators. --Fang Aili 19:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm afraid its an instance of people not understanding the rules. (The List of admins link is wrong as well) In Wikipedia:Redirect ona t the top of this page it is made clear that such redirects (no matter how convenient) are to be deleted. The users who are voting here don't understand this policy. As to Flamarande's comments I say AGF. I did nothing of the sort. I didn't even delete this template (and I deleted nothing after listing them here as you suggested). So I have no idea what you are talking about. Also note that two other respected admins (Tony Sidaway and Pathoschild) speedied this redirect (they were right to do so), but to clear it for users who don't understand the policy on inter-namespace redirects I listed them here. I am not here to destroy your userboxes *sheesh* this isn't a conspiracy. Cross-namespace redirect = bad and have always been that way. We're only having this conversation because it's about userboxes. I fear mentioning this, but a few clicks down the page you will find the uncontrovertial nomination of Rollback feature. If you want a quick way to acess the userboxes page use the WP shortcuts (WP:UB). BrokenSegue 21:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
First I have to apolagize to Broken. I confused him with the administrator who deleted the redirects whithout following proper channels and also imediatly put a deletedpages on it (see the talpages). I am sorry. But there a lawfull exceptions to rule mentioned above which (in my opinion) also apply to these case. Flamarande 18:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to think that it falls under: "*5. It is a cross-space redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace."
I can certainly understand that, but fact is that these redirects also fall under: However, avoid deleting such redirects if:"*3. They aid searches on certain terms." and "*5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful — this is not because the other person is a liar, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways."
    • Delete per norm. Those who voted keep, see BrokenSegue's rationale at Talk:Userboxes. This isn't a move against userboxes. All such inter-namespace redirects should be deleted. --Fang Aili 21:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete per nom and second what Fang Aili said. Mackensen (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete all cross-namespace redirects. -- JLaTondre 01:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete all cross-namespace redirects. —Cryptic (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep, redirects are cheap. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep - Look at the alternative: a user who wants to find out how to use userboxes types it in the searchbox, only to get an ugly page with a "this page has been deleted" notice on it. What kind of impression does that give to a newbie about the usability of Wikipedia? To whose benefit is that? The user isn't looking for an encyclopedia article on it, they just want to add the damn things to their userpage, or take a look at the gallery of them. Without a deleted notice page nor a redirection, the result is a search list with Wikipedia:Userboxes right at the top. Your solution has users seeing a "deleted" notice page, forcing them to backtrack to hit the search button. Why not cut the steps down to one: hit the go button and go straight to the desired page? IT MAKES NO SENSE TO HAMPER THE USABILITY OF WIKIPEDIA FOR THE SAKE OF A PEDANTIC RULE. Please don't break the search box: I typed in "userboxes" and got an ugly page with a notice leading me here. This is NOT what I was looking for! Think of the user and what he or she wants to find when typing in the term. Make Wikipedia work better, make it intuitive. Empathize with the user, for that's who we are serving. --Go for it! 04:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong keep. What harm is this page doing anyone? You might not like userboxes, but it's an awfully cheap way to get rid of them--by making them impossible for new users to learn about. AmiDaniel 06:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong keep. I think this deletion was made by a group of strict interpreters of wikipedia policy, and it is rediculous to delete this, unless someone will write an article on userboxes that is informative, and includes a link to the wikipedia userspace page, but that encyclopedic information is already found in the wiki-space. It is a useful link that makes wikipedia easier to navigate. Clarkefreak ∞ 23:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong keep. as per Go for it! and Clarkefreak --Varco 15:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as per User:Go for it! -arctic gnome 17:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 7, '06 [17:17] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Userboxes → Wikipedia:Userboxes -- Same as the above, but it's a soft redirect (even worse). BrokenSegue 23:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong Keep I have advocated the recreation of the redirect ever since that weird deletion conspricy. Beside, many new users will have no idea how to find userboxes without it. If this is deleted, might as well do this to all redirects. The Republican 03:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong Keep the policy on no self-references does not mean that no search term or redirect can point to an article about Wikipedia. The policy is meant to prevent *useless* self-references, such as "This Wikipedia article is about Cats" at the top of the Cat article. Johntex\talk 03:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong Keep I can see no wrong with this redirect. I helps the WikiUser and does no harm. I can only ask you to explain us what harm is done by that redirect. Flamarande 18:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete per nom. Those who voted keep, see BrokenSegue's rationale at Talk:Userboxes. This isn't a move against userboxes. All such inter-namespace redirects should be deleted. --Fang Aili 21:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete per nom and second what Fang Aili said. Mackensen (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete, or if not deleted, at least make it a real redirect. "Soft redirects" are the most useless thing since decaffeinated coffee. — Mar. 4, '06 [00:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Delete all cross-namespace redirects. -- JLaTondre 01:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete all cross-namespace redirects. —Cryptic (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep, redirects are cheap. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep - Look at the alternative: a user who wants to find out how to use userboxes types it in the searchbox, only to get an ugly page with a "this page has been deleted" notice on it. What kind of impression does that give to a newbie about the usability of Wikipedia? To whose benefit is that? The user isn't looking for an encyclopedia article on it, and certainly not an ugly dead end -- they just want to add userboxes to their userpage, or take a look at the gallery of them. Without a deleted notice page nor a redirection, the result is a search list with Wikipedia:Userboxes right at the top. Your solution has users seeing a "deleted" notice page, forcing them to backtrack to hit the search button. Why not cut the steps down to one: hit the go button and go straight to the desired page? IT MAKES NO SENSE TO HAMPER THE USABILITY OF WIKIPEDIA FOR THE SAKE OF A PEDANTIC RULE. Please don't break the search box: I typed in "userboxes" and got an ugly page with a notice leading me here. This is NOT what I was looking for! Think of the user and what he or she wants to find when typing in the term. Make Wikipedia work better, make it intuitive. Empathize with the user, for that's who we are serving. --Go for it! 05:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong keep per what I said above. AmiDaniel 06:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strong keep see above. Clarkefreak ∞ 23:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. This is a cross-namespace link, which is not allowed. Deleting this has nothing to do with userboxes per se, other publishers may mirror the contents of Wikipedia, and cross-namespace links break. -- Donald Albury (Dalbury)(Talk) 11:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 18:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted (see the discussion for One millionth article, nominated on the previous day (1 March 2006). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Please note also the poll below on One millionth article, which currently has 3 opinions to keep compared the the one opinion listing it for consideration here. Thank you, Johntex\talk 19:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Duly noted, but please notice this article was created under different circumstances, deleted a few times, then recreated as a redirect. And while "One millionth article" is a somewhat likely search string, "one million articles" is hard to make sense of. --Grocer 19:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 3

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept, though I wish we could do away with these at some point. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:14] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:14] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Malformed, unlikely search term. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:14] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Marijuana / Cannabis (drug) → Cannabis (drug) -- Bad page move by Moskvech (talk · contribs) —Viriditas | Talk 03:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was deleted. Definition is not mentioned in target article. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:14] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Binskiffler -> Dumpster diving - there is no evidence that this word exists outside of us and our mirrors (Google results). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binskiffler. —Cryptic (talk) 14:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was disambiguated. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:14] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Shadows (album) → Shadows (Gordon Lightfoot album) -- This redirect was created out of a page move in line with the album page guidelines. All pages that previously linked to this redirect now link directly to the main page and thus the redirect serves no purpose. Shadow007 15:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • March 4

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was redirected to Sioux Gateway Airport. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:26] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    SUX should redirect to the Sioux Gateway Airport in Sioux City, Iowa. SUX is the three-letter IATA code.

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Write a disambiguation page later if you want. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:26] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirected to To Tell the Truth. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:26] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept and tagged as {{R from song}}. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:26] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Under the Double Eagle → Josef Wagner (composer) -- This is a piece of music written by Wagner which redirects to Wagner. This is inappropriate. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 20:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep. I'm not sure why you think that's inappropriate. Pointing people to where information is discussed when there's not an article on the topic is one of the purposes of redirects. -- JLaTondre 22:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • The reason for the existence of this particular redirect is almost definitely because it is displayed on the page March (music), where a link to Wagner's page is prominently displayed right next to the piece. I would say that its fine for this particular piece to redirect to Wagner, but it's sort of inappropriate since not all of Wagner's music redirects to him, and, indeed, far more prominent marches do not redirect to their composers, so the redirect seems somewhat out of place and redundant. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 23:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep: in the absence of an article on the march itself I can see at least two places that the redirect might point, the composer (it's current target) or a list of the composer's pieces (such as List of works by Josef Wagner), which in many cases is in fact part of the composer's biographical article. I can see, though, the point of deleting it if one wishes to discourage a trend of creating redirects for every one of every artist's works. I waffle back and forth on that particular notion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 5

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:36] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:36] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Johanesburg → Johannesburg -- Not a common misspelling that I've seen (in fact, only one article pointed there). Dbinder 13:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:36] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • List of Related topics → List of topics related to Sound Art -- Someone accidentally created an article called List of Related topics. I moved it. This redirect is meaningless. Reyk 23:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, fixed double redirect. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:36] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:36] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Gərbəˈtɕov → Mikhail Gorbachev -- Fun with IPA is not a plausible reason for a redirect. Seems like it might be a test page by a relatively new user. Kinu t/c 06:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • March 6

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was speedily deleted and Academic dress of the University of Durham was moved to Academic dress of Durham University. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Target article does not contain the word "warehouse". — Mar. 12, '06 [13:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was kept. I'm confident that this redirect will prevent at least one duplicate article. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Lions Gate Films-merged with Lions Gate Entertainment
    • Keep. Seems like a worthwhile redirect for people unaware of the merger searching under the old company name.--Andrew c 02:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was kept, harmless, may need to be moved back at some point anyway. Plus if it's been there for a while, there are probably a lot of old page revisions that link to it. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:43] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Knocked Up (film) → Knocked Up -- Self-nom. Originally made to disamb, but wasn't it needed so the page was moved. Resulting redirect not needed. Crumbsucker 13:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept as a stub. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 7

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Not mentioned in latter article as a variant spelling. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:52] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:52] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Field Remote Expeditionary Device → List_of_technology_in_the_Stargate_universe#FRED -- The redirect is no longer needed as an article (FRED) has been started on this subject. Veritas Panther 06:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was speedily kept as the nomination was withdrawn. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was speedily kept as the nomination was withdrawn. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:52] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was deleted, article mentions no affinity for CAPS LOCK. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:52] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • TWISTED_WHEEL → Twisted Wheel Club -- I doubt this redirect has ever been used WilliamKF 19:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was redirected to Delete. — Mar. 12, '06 [13:52] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Deletion → Wikipedia:Deletion policy -- Self reference: redirect from main namespan to Wikipedia: namespace. — Itai (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 8

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted as toofuckinglong. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:02] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not mentioned on latter page. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:02] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • KVX-FM → KLOS -- This redirect had the "considered for deletion" noticed added on 2006-02-04 by 66.81.149.82 but was not brought over to here. I support the deletion, since nothing on the KLOS page even mentions KVX-FM, let alone why there should be a redirect. —LrdChaos 16:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    The nominated redirect was redirected to holiday, per Kappa, duh. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:02] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • The Holiday → Christmas -- Not being linked on any pages. Highly unlikely that someone would search for "The Holiday" if they are searching for Christmas, and it's blocking a page move. Crumbsucker 17:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:02] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, somebody went overboard. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:02] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by (aeropagitica) as part of AfD result. -- JLaTondre 13:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jupiter_and_Internet_conspiracists → Jupiter Conspiracy Theories -- listed page on afd, if deleted, delete redirect, if keep, keep redirect. Polonium 23:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 9

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:05] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    March 10

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. On the whole, these are only 7 letters shorter than the actual title. Stupid. Maybe we could create numbered BJAODN redirects like WP:BJAODN/1, WP:BJAODN/2, WP:BJAODN/ALL, etc. Those would actually be useful. — Mar. 12, '06 [14:12] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirected to List of Byzantine Emperors, which covers the topic. Also tagged as an {{R with possibilities}}, as this should probably become its own article in the future. — Mar. 12, '06 [18:12] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, stupid question mark. — Mar. 16, '06 [20:23] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 16, '06 [20:23] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was speedied. Created in error, with regards to namespaces. — Mar. 12, '06 [18:23] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    March 11

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 16, '06 [20:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was changed by User:Tothebarricades.tk to point to Manhattan. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, duh... — Mar. 16, '06 [20:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Demo version → Demo -- Was used only once in the Witchaven 2 article. I fixed the link to point directly to the proper article: Game demo. Redirect is quite useless, since normally one would search for 'Demo' or 'Game demo' instead of 'Demo version' Yaco 03:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC
      • Strong Keep - Demo version, while an uncommonly used term these days, has been a rather common way to refer to a demo in the past and I wouldn't be surprised if people still searched for the term demo version today.
      • Keep but redirect should point to an article like Game demo, instead of to a disambig page. AmiDaniel 01:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 12

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sounds reasonable. I've removed my redirect suggestion & concur with delete. -- JLaTondre 13:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, because it doesn't do much harm. I have no idea what it means to transwiki a redirect. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was speedied. It's gone. — Mar. 12, '06 [18:25] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Situatedness → Situated -- Situatedness is not an actual word, nor is it commonly used. The redirect is completely unnecessary as no one would search for it and only one article links to it...which is probably why the redirect was created in the first place. AmiDaniel 19:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 13

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Xaosflux. -- JLaTondre 03:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. No "votes", and it seems a reasonable redirect (Tikka Rain is mentioned on the target page). Notability requirements are minimal for redirects. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 04:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 14

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The discussion is moot, after EurekaLott's revert. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 15

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were all deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. User:King V seems to be in the know. I'm slightly worried though about the number of pages linking to GM 3200 engine. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • GM_3200_engine → GM_60-Degree_V6_engine -- There is no such thing as a GM 3200 engine. There was, in 1978 and 1979, a Buick 3.2L V6 (196 CID), but it was based on the Buick 3.8L V6, and it was never called a 3200. Both are 90 degree V6 engines, not 60 degree. The Buick 3.2L is mentioned on the GM 3800 engine page. King V 16:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Tentative Keep- searching for this sounds like an honest mistake someone might make. Reyk 21:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • But it would still be incorrect, and direct them to the wrong page. The problems are that the Buick 3.2L V6:
          • pre-dates the GM_60-Degree_V6_engine
          • is a 90-degree design, not a 60-degree design.
          • pre-dates GM's use of rounded-off cc designations such as 3300, 3800, etc., in lieu of liter-designations such as 3.0, 4.1 by about 9 to 10 years. GM didn't start the cc designations until 1988.
        • That's my take on it, anyway. I might grudgingly concede that the redirect should be left in, and redirect to the LC9 entry on the 3800's page, but given my third point listed above, I don't really think that would be such a good idea, either. --King V 22:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Search is case-insensitive anyway. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Mike Rosoft as Hoax/vandalism, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TropicaI Storm Jason. -- JLaTondre 23:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, after Alex43223's explanation. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Premears → Disney Channel Original Movie -- I'm not quite sure why this redirect was created. I believe the creator meant create "Premiers", but even still, why it would redirect to Disney Channel Original Movie isn't made clear. Just because the movies premier on Disney Channel, doesn't mean Premears has to redirect to it. lightdarkness (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I created this because of the old name of Disney Channel Original movies was premEARS (check [5]), but mostly because there is already a redirect for premEARS (The title is PremEARS on Wiki), and if someone typed this with the wrong spelling, I figured this would direct them where they wanted. Alex43223 04:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, created purely to attack the rival team. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Rossami. -- JLaTondre 18:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 16

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was converted into a disambiguation page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 17

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept, reasonable enough. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:01] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:01] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:01] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:01] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:01] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 18

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 29, '06 [08:47] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • There are already many many articles of a country's performance at a particular games. For example, all the competing countries at the 2006 Commonwealth Games have their own article about their results. Similar articles exist for the Summer and Winter Olympics. Remy B 09:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 27, '06 [06:05] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Tv-3 High School -> TV-3 - Formerly a redirect to a vanity page, which itself now redirects to a dab page. Any particular reason to keep this lying around? 00:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 19

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:46] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, Beardo seems to know what he's talking about. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:46] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, should have been tagged for speedy. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:46] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. If loops are a problem, de-link the .us page. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:46] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, doesn't seem to be a major issue. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:46] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Redirects are cheap; create one at rice table, too (if there is more general usage, someone can always replace redirect with an article later). Gene Nygaard 16:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 27, '06 [07:36] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 20

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was delete. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:47] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Comment People may put part of a name in quotes, but are unlikely to search for a name with the whole thing in quotes. I can understand using quotes:
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 21

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:52] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, appears to be from a rather major content merge. Latter page has an extensive trivia section. GFDL, preserve authorship, blah blah blah. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:52] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, should have been speedied as a broken redirect. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:52] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 23

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Should have been speedied. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:56] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Should have been speedied. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:56] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Should have been speedied. — Mar. 27, '06 [11:56] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 24

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was #redirected Naser Khader {{R from surname}}. — Mar. 27, '06 [12:05] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    The only Khader I know if is Naser Khader. It should redirect to him. DanielDemaret 12:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was reverted. This is where you use a template that says "for other uses, see Foo (disambiguation), etc." at the top of the primary topic page. — Mar. 27, '06 [12:05] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    But, again, nothing uses Catholicism (disambiguation) as a disambiguation! There is no reason to keep it. --Hyphen5 13:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, {{R from alternate language}}. — Mar. 27, '06 [12:05] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 25

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept per Ceyockey. Note also that somebody might search for "Area code 908" because they want to know the origin of a strange phone call they've received, who knows? — Mar. 30, '06 [09:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. If nobody noticed it by now, nobody's gonna miss it. — Mar. 30, '06 [09:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was speedied some days ago ~ Veledan • Talk 20:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not because it's a spelling error ("e"/"é"), and the spacing error, but because it's an unlikely search term. The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 26

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, there being no objection and no logical reason not to delete. Kelly Martin (talk) 06:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Should have been speedy deleted under at least 3 criteria. — Mar. 27, '06 [12:09] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 27

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was un-redirected by User:Emana. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was softened (i.e., turned into a soft redirect). I think this is a good compromise between the positions taken. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Protologism → Neologism. AfD deleted this article but it has reappeared as a redirect. Given that the word is Wikipedic navel gazing, appears in no dictionaries and that Wikipedia is not one and that Wikipedia has already rejected the term as unsuitable for inclusion, there is no case for retaining such a redirect. It's already at Wiktionary, which allows protologisms; we all know that Wikpedia does not, and we should resist the temptation to think that invented terminology is somehow encyclopedic just because it's handy in AfD debate. It also should not be alternatively targetted out of article space, since such redirects are bad. -Splashtalk 02:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • We have Wikipedia:Neologism already for just that purpose. That page should be edited if necessary, but we should not clutter the encyclopedia with such things out of what really amounts to laziness: the inner workings of things, by long, very intelligent practise, have no place appearing in article space. We make some exceptions, but really this isn't one of them since, as indicated by the Whatlinkshere list, it is only ever referred to in AfD. Make a WP: shortcut to Wikipedia:Neologism, by all means, but don't pollute article space. -Splashtalk 02:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • That would seem to work. So why not just redirect to that page? The important thing is that a user can type protologism into the search page and get to an explanation, because that's how people find info here. I don't think you are suggesting that new users would know a shortcut.-- JJay 12:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not a big fan of cross-namespace redirects but I think it would be ok in this case. That being said, redirecting to WP:NEO isn't really that helpful as it uses the term but never defines it. kotepho 00:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedily Deleted as a G2 test page, etc. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 05:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 28

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was speedy deleted. — Mar. 29, '06 [08:55] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 29

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Johnleemk | Talk 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====*Drop the soap → Prison rape==== -- I appreciate there are some funny crude jokes that connect the two articles but I can't imagine anyone who wants to read about prison rape searching for this. Also, prison rape makes no mention of the expression drop the soap (nor should it) so the redirect could be confusing if encountered during a search. Lastly, prison rape is not a humorous topic and I think the presence of this redirect is one of those little things that detracts (if only slightly) from the prestige and professionalism of this project ~ Veledan • Talk 23:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was delete – Sceptre (Talk) 10:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Timeline of Kurdish history → Kurdish people==== -- I just deleted the only link using Timeline of Kurdish history from List of Themed Timelines because Kurdish people isn't and doesn't contain a timeline JeffW 21:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Johnleemk | Talk 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Gori (city in Georgia) → Gori, Georgia==== -- Highly unlikely anyone would search for that. Only link to it is the disambig page Gori, which I'm now going to repair to point to the target. AmiDaniel (Talk) 12:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Johnleemk | Talk 12:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ===='ole ball 'n chain → significant other==== -- Implausible search term; smacks of POV; "ball and chain" could refer to anything listed in the "see also" section of significant other. –Sommers (Talk) 01:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted already, by somebody else. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:24] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    ====Uncle Jerry → North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics==== -- Uncle Jerry is not mentioned at target article and it's too generic. Looking at history, it was originally a redirect to Gerald Boarman which was a redirect to the school. A bot corrected the double redirect, but missed that this was probably a vanity redirect based upon family relationship (i.e. Gerald is someone's uncle). -- JLaTondre 02:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted already, by somebody else. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:24] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    ====Created → St. John's College, U. S.==== -- From creation summary: Forgot to remove beginning of phrase when cutting and pasting (when I created this mis-named page). Redirect name has no relation with target article. -- JLaTondre 04:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was no consensus – Sceptre (Talk) 10:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma → Cherokee==== -- nonexistent tribal entity --PeyoteMan 06:19, 29 March 2006

    This WP:Rfd seems to be an artifact of a political dispute between various factions within the Cherokee nation, and is a recurring focus of the edit wars currently taking place on Chad_"Corntassel"_Smith between User:Johnc1, see http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Johnc1, and others.
    User:Johnc1 seems to promote the Cherokee_Nation_of_Oklahoma (visit "Cherokee Website of Truth"); conversely, it is opposed (in this instance) by User:PeyoteMan/User:Waya sahoni/User:Gadugi, who seemingly prefers Cherokee_Nation.
    Just an observation... -- talks_to_birds 08:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was delete – Sceptre (Talk) 10:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Criticism_of_Ataturk → Atatürk's reforms==== -- Implausible redirect, the page redirected to is not related to criticism either in content or title. Pti 14:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Mikkalai as (redir to deleted page). -- JLaTondre 11:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Allied atrocities → World War II atrocities==== -- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War II atrocities. No links to the page--Philip Baird Shearer 16:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Mikkalai as (stray redir to deleted page). -- JLaTondre 11:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    ====Scorched Lands and others Japanese contermeasures against enemy invading forces in WW2 → World War II atrocities==== -- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War II atrocities. No link to the page. Page has been a redirect since the day it was created Philip Baird Shearer 16:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was no longer a redirect. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:24] <freakofnurxture|talk>

    ====Cultural intelligence --> Race and intelligence.==== User:Proto created the page and redirect after a question at the reference desk, with the mistaken assumption that cultural intelligence was linked to race. The two topics are, in fact, completely unrelated, as this google search demonstrates (cultural intelligence is an organisational psych/ management theory about how people of different cultures relate to each other, and cultural diversity within organisations). I reverted the redirect and requested that the page be speedied (as it was then blank) and was directed here. I will be happy to request that the article on cultural intelligence be created once it stops redirecting to something totally inappropriate. Natgoo 22:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    I've written a stub on the topic, the issue's now fixed. Natgoo 18:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 30

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was This is page is for redirect deletions - not merges. However, I'll redirect EMI Manhattan Records to Manhattan Records as the first is a subset of the second. -- JLaTondre 18:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Little Johnny Taylor converted to stub. -- JLaTondre 18:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 11:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops, my bad, I speedied it as an implausible typo (created by pagemove error) and forgot to say so. I got sidetracked trying to figure out why the hell the target article had an &emdash; instead of a hyphen. — Mar. 30, '06 [12:37] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Redirected to SPL. Spl was changed to an article on sound pressure level. Since there is already a sound pressure level article, this was redudant. The easiest solution was to redirect Spl to SPL which has sound pressure level as one of the disambig destinations. I recognize closing a nomination you've been involved with is against protocal, but given it matches the recommendations of both responders & is the easiest way to deal with the nomination being replaced with a duplicate article, I'm going to be bold. -- JLaTondre 13:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Sceptre with summary of (per RfD). -- JLaTondre 00:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Both deleted. The Land 20:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    March 31

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept. Johnleemk | Talk 10:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I think a reasonable English version would be simply missing the diacritics, but this one is a gross misspelling--"i" instead of "y", and missing "cz". Appleseed (Talk) 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep These are helpful redirects. Anyone trying to spell the name only having heard it rather than seen it is quite likely to use an I. They are not doing any harm are they? ~ Veledan • Talk 16:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    As I mentioned on Kusma's talk page, the misspellings are so flagrant and bizarre that there's no way someone would be able to reproduce them. There are many easy ways to find the page if you don't know how to spell the article name or the name of a dozen of its more valid redirects: the Polish monarchs template, categories, and other articles. Appleseed (Talk) 16:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, looks like an ugly encoding error. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:21] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:21] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. Johnleemk | Talk 10:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I think a reasonable English version would be simply missing the diacritics, but this, too, is a gross misspelling; it adds an "i" and is missing an "e". Appleseed (Talk) 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete. Google seems to agree with you; this misspelling is only found on Wikipedia mirrors. Kusma (討論) 23:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was made to redirect to Stanislaus. Johnleemk | Talk 10:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was made to redirect to Michael. Johnleemk | Talk 10:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, looks like an ugly encoding error. — Apr. 2, '06 [19:21] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. Johnleemk | Talk 10:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept. Johnleemk | Talk 10:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    There is already a redirect from "August the Strong". Appleseed (Talk) 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Almost a textbook case for {{R from other capitalisation}}, see Wikipedia:Redirect. Kusma (討論) 23:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Keep & add {{R from misspelling}}. -- JLaTondre 03:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Redirect_Archives/March_2006&oldid=1146452707"