Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Energy/archive1
After having improved the energy portal, I would welcome feedback and in particular suggestions on further work required to bring it to Featured status. The key area already apparent is the need to turn over 'selected content' faster (currently running at every 6 weeks) - I'm hoping to involve the three related Wikiprojects in this and have posted messages to their talk pages about this today (see here). Gralo 16:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, overall very nice I do have a couple of comments and a questions.
- Is there a reason you have the Read more, Archive, and suggest links set up in a nest? (One below the other and tabbed over) The reason I ask is it kinda throws the flow of the portal off.
- There's a difficult three-way balance between giving too little information, giving too much, and looking visually attractive. The Archive • Nominations • Read more... style seems a little too concise for the uninitiated, the style I'd chosen not ideal either. I've changed it again but will consider other solutions.
- In your associated wikimedia section some of the links go to pages that don't exist on the sister projects they should either be created or deleted.
- They did all go to at least a spaceholder page, but I see that someone on Wikiquote has deleted the page for a second time...
- The Major fields of technology section where your using the hide box is great but in some browsers the unhide function doesn't work so I would recommend moving it to your topics and categories tab and defaulting it to unhide.
- I hadn't spotted that someone had added that! I've done as you suggest but, since the 'technology portal' is listed as a related portal, I may well remove it entirely.
- As a norm most portals don't have a TOC. Thats not to say it won't go over here, but it's something you may want to look at removing or making it smaller so it's not as obtrusive at the beginning of the portal.
- True, but I added it after I found it a useful navigation aid on the Medicine Portal, and use it regularly myself.
Again looks good with a little work you shouldn't have a problem going to featured candidate.Cheers — WilsBadKarma (Talk) 16:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to offer your advice! Gralo 17:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, let's see what I can come up with:
- Page contents I can see as an easy nav aid, but like the medicine portal, I would add it into a box. The beginning Portal:Energy/Title box seems most likely, although that would mean creating another for the other tab.
- I like the uncluttered title box, which is why I didn't do the same as the medicine portal. Currently think about adding just adding a border around it, but with the white page background I don't think it looks too strange as it is...
- Introduction, I'm sure you can find an image or two to place in there. It would liven it up.
- You're right - done. May add another if I can find something suitable.
- The {{Portal|Energy}} seems a little redundant in the archive pages.
- True - removed.
- Most generally, selected article summary images do not have a caption, which, personally is what I prefer, but I do think it is a personal preference.
- Should probably also depend on how self-explanatory the image is - the first in the archive didn't have a caption, for example.
- The current pic does not link commons:User:Charliebrown7034
- Fixed
- I like the setup of the topics section
- Thanks :-)
- The major fields of technology template still remains. If you must have it, there has got to be a better place for it.
- Having though about it some more since WilsBadKarma's post, I think it should go too - so it's gone.
- As for selected content rotation, I would abandon the time rotate to a fully randomized way. Energy should have enough FA and GA articles to satisfy content issues.
- Yes, I've been thinking about that. If there is not much response from the wikiprojects to my suggestion that they get involved, it's probably the way to go. Would just need to find the time to identify the articles (since there aren't actually that many that have been rated) and get them summarised. Due to time constraints I may start with randomizing the selected images, since several have been identified.
Other than those few minor things, definitely ready for featured. :) Joe I 06:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! Gralo 20:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)