Wikipedia:Peer review/Yankee Hotel Foxtrot/archive1
I would like some feedback on how to better develop this article. Any tips (such as prose, content recommendations) on how to improve this article to possibly FA status would be greatly appreciated. Teemu08 22:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Teemu08! Nice job! According to me, this article should at least feature a section about the musical content (and maybe the lyrics too) to reach the FA status. Frédérick Lacasse 23:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]- It has an image, but the automated process didn't recognize it because it was in the infobox. Free-use wouldn't apply in the case of most articles about albums. — WiseKwai 23:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- Avoid using contractions like: weren't, didn't.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, — WiseKwai 23:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, I've incorporated what I can from the automated program, and I plan on adding a section about album content before I submit this to FAC. I'd love to hear some more suggestions if they're out there. Teemu08 06:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)