Wikipedia:Peer review/Windracers/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am keen for any suggestions for improvement. I would also like the page to be indexed on search engines to encourage contributions by the broader wikipedia community.
Thanks, Vcwatcher (talk) 09:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Airship
[edit]The good news is that the page is already indexed on search engines! If you want further comments, focused on general improvement, read below.
- It's a short article, but seems fairly broad (and of course the company was only founded in 2017, so there's not much to say). I would still advise expanding the lead, to cover all the entities the company has been involved with, something like "Windracers has worked with the Royal Mail, Royal Navy, British Atlantic Survey, Purdue University, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
- The "Safety" section doesn't need a separate heading—it can just go under "Aircraft".
- I would also advise merging the paragraphs in the "History" section so that it flows better; at the moment the prose is quite disjointed.
- The people mentioned in the infobox are not cited or mentioned in the body. Including a sentence on them would be best. Also, the products "see aircraft" parameter isn't needed—it's a short article, people can just scroll down.
- The first paragraph of "Aircraft" contains too many "it"s for my liking—try and smoothen the prose a little.
- One more point: "The company then expanded into USA" is ungrammatical, and a little bit odd seeing as it wasn't an expansion of selling products, merely a collaboration with a university. Maybe just remove that phrase?
Otherwise, nice job. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to close this PR since the user who opened it has not edited since August. A new PR can be opened by any editor once the above are considered. Z1720 (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)