Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/William Utermohlen/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get this article to featured article status after my previous unsuccessful nomination, archived five days ago. I would like comments about any criteria.

Thanks, Realmaxxver (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Kavyansh.Singh

[edit]

All these are just suggestions, feel free to ignore any which you didn't like.

Will continue. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some edits myself, feel free change back or let me know if you disagree with something. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent and highly interesting article about an exceptional man. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query from Z1720

[edit]

Hi Realmaxxver, are you still interested in getting comments for this article? This PR is getting old and the longer a PR goes without comments the less likely someone will review. I suggest that you ask editors listed at WP:FAM to comment in this PR, especially those interested in visual arts. I also encourage you to look at the last FAC, fix the concerns that were posted there, and ask editors who posted in the last FAC to look at this again. Z1720 (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 I am going to ask Ceoil to add comments here. I have done most concerns on that previous FAC, but I might notify them when I bring this back to FAC. I might also notify GhostRiver, who did the GA review. Realmaxxver (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TBH, I am getting tired of waiting for new comments now, starting FAC. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]