Wikipedia:Peer review/Warner and Swasey Observatory/archive1
I wrote almost a hundred stubs back in December and now I'm going back to the best ones to see if I can get them on the Good Articles page. Before that, I thought I’d put it up for peer review since I’ve only dealt with stubs before. What should be done to this article to have it meet GA criteria?--Rayc 21:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nice! It has good notes, and the "introduction paragraph" sums it up very well. I really like the chart on the side! The pictures are useful too. I might have to go visit it! :) I don't know what it takes to be officially "GA", but it seems pretty good to me. But maybe more information on the individual telescopes would be better. I found these links: http://www.cwru.edu/pubs/cnews/1998/12-3/nassau.htm, http://faculty.rmwc.edu/tmichalik/openclus.htm, and http://www.icstars.com/warner_swasey/1999_Project_Update.htm. HTH! Sarah crane 14:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- It looks pretty decent, but I think it could be expanded. What I don't see in the article, for example, are some of the significant results or contributions by the observatory. I don't see a list of the observatory directors (Jason John Nassau, William Bidelman, R. Earle Luck, &c.) There's also some information here and here that I don't think I see included. Thanks! — RJH 15:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)