Wikipedia:Peer review/Utah State Route 68/archive1

Utah State Route 68

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking for any potential feedback before listing this article on WP:FAC.

Thanks, Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 14:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied from closed ACR) -

More comments - Alright, don't shoot me for these -
- No refs in the lead.
- That said, some of the stuff in there should be moved to their respective sections (the AADT and traffic stuff, and the construction info. Those should be moved to the RD and history, respectively)
  - True, can you think of anything to add to the lead then, it does need a 2nd paragraph if you want to move that stuff --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how the I-215 image pertains to this article; sure, it's the Redwood Road exit, but that's about it. We don't see any part of that road; all we get is a sign with the SR-68 shield.
  - True... --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs are always, always past the punctuation mark. I'll fix this last one. CL — 04:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks! --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- One more thing; do we need the sub-headers in the RD? Two of them only have one paragraph in them. I find em unnecessary, but that's just me - CL — 04:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - This was suggested in IRC when the ACR was still active --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
- Current ref 6 is lacking a last access date.
  - Fixed --Admrb♉ltz (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Current ref 10 http://www.benchmark.com/ takes me not to a map...
  - It takes you to the store for the map, the map is not available online --Admrb♉ltz (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 16:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC)