Wikipedia:Peer review/Ultimate Fighting Championship/archive1
I think this article is getting close to good article or feature article status. Within the WP:MMA project, it seems to be the best article out of the entire project, and I think getting some feedback can help us in the project concentrate on finding out what exactly it takes to elevate articles to a GA or FA status. hateless 01:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Nice article, still room for improvement though:
- "human cockfighting" in the lead does not reappear in the main body. EVERYTHING you say in the lead needs to be repeated below, or cut it out entirely.
- Could use some more pics, e.g. of historical matches (1992?) or of the video games
- Too many redlinks, please de-wikilink them or create new articles
- "86,592 television subscribers" in 1992 needs sourcing
- "Many martial artists believed that technique could overcome these size disadvantages..." (1992 section) => source plz
- "Controversy and reform" is undersourced
- "Evolution of the UFC rules" is unsourced
- That were my 2 cents. If you could give Wikipedia:Peer_review/Wilt_Chamberlain a look, I would be happy. —Onomatopoeia 08:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)