Wikipedia:Peer review/The Rape of Nanking (book)/archive1
I'll be making an FA push for this article. But before that, I want to put it through a peer review. Any suggestions to improve the article to FA quality would be very helpful. Thanks. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Automated Peer Review
[edit]The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), organise (B) (American: organize), recognize (A) (British: recognise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), criticise (B) (American: criticize), ization (A) (British: isation), traveled (A) (British: travelled).
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 15:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Javascript!
- I could not find instances of individually linked months or days of the week. Somebody please point them out if you can find them.
- Infobox is now provided.
- The sentence containing the word incorrectly is now specifically provided with a footnote at the end.
- I switched the spellings of criticised and organised to criticized and organized respectively. (American spelling for an article about an American book)