Wikipedia:Peer review/Star Wars: Jedi Arena/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I have listed this article for peer review because the article appears from my perspective to be largely complete based on all the available resources that I can obtain. After finding all the available reliable sources that I could, I am looking for further ideas about how to improve this article.
Thanks, Gamingforfun365 (talk) 23:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Comments by IDV
[edit]Just some quick notes.
- "Game box front cover art" can be simplified to "Box art" or "Cover art"
- Add alt text to the images - something like "The cover shows the character Luke Skywalker deflecting a laser blast from a seeker ball using his lightsaber" and "Animated footage of typical gameplay, showing two lightsabers deflecting laserblasts from a seeker ball from an overhead perspective" (you can go ahead and copy those exact examples if you want to, I don't mind)
- Don't link Parker Brothers twice in the infobox
- The lead seems a bit short - perhaps add an example or two of what aspects of the game critics liked and disliked
- "and finally the opponent himself" assumes that player 2 is male - I would suggest something like "and finally directly at the opponent"
- The GameTrailers ref should have GameTrailers in |work=, IGN or Ziff Davis (IGN's parent company) in |publisher=, and YouTube in |via=
- Similarly, the Google Books refs should have Google Books in |via=
- The "development" and "release" sections are both quite short - I'd probably combine them into a single section titled "development and release" to avoid the article looking shorter and choppier than it has to be
- Similarly, I'd advise against splitting reception into multiple sub-sections before the section is of a certain length - I'd just remove the "legacy" section heading
- Maybe this is obvious, but how is Warlords related?
- Add archive links to your refs whenever possible (we can't do it for youtube or google books though - although it wouldn't even be necessary for the latter, as the physical books exist independently of the website...)
--IDVtalk 20:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have addressed all of the given issues.
Gamingforfun365 (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)