Wikipedia:Peer review/Spooks/archive1
I'm just generally curious to get a full list on what needs to be done for this article, esp for it to reach good article status at least. For a programme that manages almost 6m viewers it shouldnt be too hard :) RHB 22:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I was just looking at this the other day, wondering what could be done with it (as I'm a big fan of this series). It's a bit of a mess at the moment. For inspiration, we should look at The West Wing (TV series) or Lost (TV series). The individual episode pages need to all be created and outlined with the basic plot (and any other notable info). That could take a while in itself but shouldn't be too hard. It then needs to be summarised on the main page. A tidy cast list needs to be created. A history of the creation of it needs to be written and cited. A referenced critical response section is required. Plus, other comments - possibly about how some have noticed it's accuracy to real life events. There's a lot to do, but most of it isn't too hard. Trebor 22:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 01:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)