Wikipedia:Peer review/SDS-PAGE/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
Hi, I've listed this article for peer review because…
- it's about the method with the most cited paper by a single author in the world.
- i believe it's a decent and comprehensive article (don't know a better one on the subject, but i may have overlooked some of the myriad references ;)
- probably there might be some language and comprehensibility issues, where i might need your help.
- if you have suggestions on what's missing, i'd be more than happy.
Thanks, Ghilt (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- You should request GA status first, it makes easier to get through peer review and then go to FAC. Mdob (talk) 09:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, i didn't necessarily seek an article status so far, merely a review to improve the article, so should i still go there? Cheers, --Ghilt (talk) 23:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Just at a glance, several of the longer paragraphs/sections (especially Applications and the beginning of Procedure) have great/most likely accurate information but no in-line citations. The information is most likely verifiable in many of the references already provided, but it might be good to add one or two into the longer sections with no citations. On the opposite end, the bit on silver staining has 6 citations, some of which might not be necessary. That's all I've got :) originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 00:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)