Wikipedia:Peer review/Richard Dawkins/archive2
For earlier discussion see Wikipedia:Peer review/Richard Dawkins/archive1
I'd like to re-open this peer review and see if it is possible to obtain any more feedback on the article in its current form. It has been worked on quite a bit since a year ago. I think the article is just about ready to be submitted to the FA process, but would like to identify any possible objections. Metamagician3000 13:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- The sentence Both were interested in the natural sciences, and answered the young Dawkins' questions in more scientific than anecdotal or supernatural terms. is kind of jarring in an encyclopaedia.
- He then studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, where he was tutored by Nobel Prize-winning ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen. Was this during his undergrad or PhD. In his info box Niko Tinbergen is described as his Academic advisor, does that mean the same as his PhD supervisor? There is a differing level of involvement in the two, and it would be really useful to clarify that.
- The Richard Dawkins Foundation section could use some explaining, don't rely on a quote to do all your talking.
Hope this helps Sabine's Sunbird talk 19:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try to deal with all these points, or to find someone else who can. (Edit: have dealt with the first one.) Metamagician3000 08:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)