Wikipedia:Peer review/Red rain in Kerala/archive2
Appearance
For old peer review, see Wikipedia:Peer review/Red rain in Kerala/archive1
I'm hoping to get this up to FA status for April 1 (April fools main page) so I would welcome some input as how best to achieve this RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you write up some fair use rationales for the images first. bibliomaniac15 04:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Needs an SVG map
- Images should be thumbed
- Table should be right aligned. A pi chart of the data can be shown
- Copyedit required. low content of phosphorus is puzzling , is by no means rare
- Astrophysics and Space Science should be in italics
- 4.1 and 6.1 sections are bad style. Merge with parent or promote to a higher level.
- References should be preferably formatted using the citation templates available.
- Dr. - remove
- Populating red links should give the article a more professional touch
- Remove low value linking (eg wells, rainwater, milligrams etc)
- Gallery should go, merge images with text
- What was the reaction of the local people? I'm sure such an unusual phenomena should cause some sort of consternation among the local populace, even giving rise to superstitions.
- The following domains can also be combed for more information: gov.in, nic.in, ernet.in, gov ; and so too google news.