Wikipedia:Peer review/Pilot (The 4400 episode)/archive1
I've been working to get this up to the standards of a Good Article, as well as the primary source it uses multiple secondary sources and is nicely formatted. The one fair use image used has a strong fair use rationale and is used within the context of the article. Unlike most episode pages this one is not scene-by-scene and actually only summarizes a small fraction (the most integral and important parts) of the episode to stay within fair use and "WP:NOT". The article does not use anything such as "trivia" and instead of including quotes inside the page, a link to Wikiquote is offered instead. I'm personally looking for any feedback that would stop me from getting this to GA and opinions as to any faults people see. Personally I consider it an example as to what an episode page should look like and have followed the good examples et forth by the Doctor Who WikiProject. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 19:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you dig up any information about the making of the episode? How about the reception of the episode, like critical reaction, awards and nominations, or broadcast ratings? It appears the greatest law in this article is its comprehensiveness. You may want to compare to Pilot (House). Jay32183 01:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jay, I've added information on Emmy nominations and broadcast ratings so far, I'll be adding critical reception from notable sources in due course (Pilot_(The_4400_episode)#Reception) - Looking at the House article do you think that this article has the potential for a successful FAC? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 19:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's possible, as long as enough information is there and cited properly. There's no prejudice in article topic at FAC. I know it wouldn't pass now, but I assume you knew that as well. Jay32183 19:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jay, I've added information on Emmy nominations and broadcast ratings so far, I'll be adding critical reception from notable sources in due course (Pilot_(The_4400_episode)#Reception) - Looking at the House article do you think that this article has the potential for a successful FAC? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 19:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 21:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)