Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Pennsylvania Route 39/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'd like a general overview of the page, ultimately leading to FA status. --myselfalso 22:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JohnnyAlbert10

[edit]

An advice I would give you is to look for as many references as you can get on the article for FA status, although 20 is enough but the more the better. PennDOT has a lot of data on traffic counts 1 and historical maps 2. Other current metro area maps 3 and current county maps can be used as a reference for the route description. Oh and check the lead, I might have some grammar issues due to fact that I'm not good at that. Good luck on the FAC. -- JA10 T · C 22:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vishwin60

[edit]

Please, please, cite more sources! I'm especially concerned with the mileposts, because these need the most verification. V60 干什么? · VDemolitions · ER 3 04:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll takecare of it since I filled the new four digit mileposts. -- JA10 T · C 12:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That has been taken care off but its chances are better with more references. -- JA10 T · C 12:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second semi-automated peer review

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 23:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]