Wikipedia:Peer review/Paper Mario/archive3
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
Despite this article existing for less than a day, I would appreciate any comments as I will be nominating this for GA soon.
Maaaaybe FA in the future. Thanks, Panini🥪 10:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure all of those gameplay screenshots meet WP:NFCC, particularly the Super Smash Bros screenshot. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 16:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- I was going to remove that one in due time anyways. Panini🥪 16:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
There's some info in Games and Gameplay that seem unsourced. I think it's harmless and at the same time useful to use at least a cite video game template for some of these. Also, for phrases like "Super Paper Mario is the most unique game in the series" you really need secondary sources for that. Uniqueness is subjective. Nevertheless, congratulations for the work you've done for this topic. GhostP. talk 22:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Writing this to note that I'll be addressing this soon. Panini🥪 17:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- in my humble opinion, having a detailed list of games with their own paragraphs and a breakdown of the series and prose version of the series is redundant. It should be either the detailed list of games or a history breakdown of the series.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)