Wikipedia:Peer review/Nissan R90C/archive1

Nissan R90C[edit]

This is my first request for Peer Review, so hopefully this works well. I simply seek an advice for improving the style, accuracy, and presentation of the article, as well as any information that might be helpful to add or maybe even remove. Hopefully this can become a GA in the near future. It is also already under nomination for DYK. The359 05:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review by User:Mr. Killigan[edit]

Hope my suggestions helps you.

You should just describe the Nissan R90C in the opening paragraph. You should move information about the two versions elsewhere, perhaps in a new section.
The grammer could do better. For example, "Both cars would once again run towards the top of the field" can work better as "Both cars ran again towards the top of the field". You have many of these kinds of sentences in the article.
Working on the structure can be good. Theres too many really long sections.
You can expand on the development of the car and more of its development history.
Use a lot more references. The people at FAC and other reviewers for A-class review etc get picky about citations.
One or two more pictures would be nice, like the engine for example.

Great job on providing information in the article. Hope the Nissan R90C gets promoted to GA or A-class soon. Mr. Killigan 00:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]