Wikipedia:Peer review/New Jersey State Constitution/archive2

This is the second peer review for the article. I was just dissapointed with how little look-over it actually got. Please make your comments; fresh eyes welcome. Any general status comments wanted!Evan^{(Salad dressing is the milk of the infidel!)} 22:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Defunct Versions section be expanded? Secondly I would like to see some information on how it was adopted. Also it needs a copyedit because some parts dont make sense, example: "Paragraphs traditionally in Article I, eg, the banning of ex post facto laws is in Article IV "Legislative." First it makes no sense, then why can't the footnote be at the end of the sentence? Why is an abbreviation used "eg"? Also some unsourced statements come off as analysis, example: "New Jersey's constitution is often a target of criticism." - Tutmosis 00:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 01:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]