Wikipedia:Peer review/Nevill Ground/archive1

Nevill Ground

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I recently expanded it and would like feedback on how to improve this cricket article to be ready for GA.

Thanks, The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

The intro is only a few sentences long - is there any chance of expanding it so it's at least a couple paragraphs? Remember that it should sum up every section in the article.
"The Nevill Ground is known for having rhododendron bushes around the perimeter." This shouldn't need to be cited in the intro if it's something the grounds are known for. Discuss it in the body of the article as well (perhaps discuss the history of it; why is this done?) and cite it there.
"The Nevill Ground was established in 1895 after the purchase of the land by the Tunbridge Wells Cricket, Football and Athletic Club, with assistance from the Bluemantle Cricket Club, on a 99 year lease from the Marquess of Abergavenny as the land was part of his Eridge Park estate." Holy run-on sentence, batman!
The 1913 Arson section should be a subsection of the history section.
I would change the '1983 World Cup' to a subheading of something like 'Events Hosted', but that's more personal opinion than an actual article issue.--TKK ^{bark !} 13:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise fine? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would say so. If you are going for good article, make sure all your images use alt text. They also won't like the image of the Bluemantle Stand sandwiching text against the info box. I also personally prefer citations for every sentence, but I see what you've done (citing blocks of texts instead of single sentences) and it's an acceptable way of citing. --TKK ^{bark !} 23:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]