Wikipedia:Peer review/Nevado del Ruiz/archive1

Nevado del Ruiz

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know what it needs to be featured. This will be only my second geography Fa if passed and I want to know what's wrong with the prose, referencing, etc.

Thanks, —Ceranthor (formerly LordSunday) · (Testify!) 23:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good, now we can focus on Bam! I'll take a look at it, though as you probably know I'm horrible at reviewing.
- Refs: some "work=" parameters need links. For example, in ref #24 "New York Times" is linked, while in the previous one the same words are not. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 23:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That took forever. Done. —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 23:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Nevado del Ruiz consists of andesite and dacite lava." Seems a bit out of line. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 23:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved, so done. —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 19:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Woudn't an eruption in 1985 not make it dormant? the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 23:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where does it mention anywhere that is dormant, or active for that matter? ;) —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 19:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Features section-could you expand this a bit? the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 00:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is as broad as I can get it. But I'll try converting some of the Spanish references I found. —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 19:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Previous eruptions - to what? The one in 1985? also, it would be good to add more detail for each. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 00:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 19:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But could you add to it a bit? the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 19:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "It is believed both of these formed from melting of the snow and ice that cover the summit." needs a cite.the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 00:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "On the proof of several sets of gas samples, taken along the course of the three months preceding the November 13, 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz from fumaroles on the crater floor, the composition of the vapors discharged, after minor eruptive activity in September, corresponded to that of a essentially magmatic gas." tl;dr. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 00:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
done. —Ceran thor [Formerly LordSunday] 19:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]