Wikipedia:Peer review/Myrmecia (ant)/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have the intention of promoting this article to GA in the near future, and at some point, FA. The article has received a copyedit, and helpful suggestions were provided from the copyeditor. I acknowledge that three clarification tags are present, but these issues will be fixed as soon as possible. I note this article is very big, but what can I say, they're my favourite group of ants.
Thanks, Burklemore1 (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comments from Dunkleosteus77
Resolved comments from Dunkleosteus77 (push to talk) 15:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
---|
**I'm no expert on ants but I have to say this is a very well written article. One thing I have to point out is that the "Genetics" section seems to fall a bit flat when compared to the rest of the article. I suggest moving this section under the "Phylogeny" section or perhaps the "Taxonomy" section or perhaps integrate the information into one of them without giving "Genetics" its own little section.
|
- Comments from jonkerz
Resolved comments from jonkerz ♠talk 02:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
---|
**Really well-written article. It is obvious that you have put a tremendous amount of work into this.
Thank you, I think I have outdone myself in a good way with this. ;) Your comment is appreciated a lot.
I was a bit suspicious about it (684 results on google for Callytris and 148,000 for Callitris.) Removed.
I believe most people usually use "an" if the M is a standalone letter (an M.16 assault rifle is grammatically correct for example). Thanks for pointing this out, also detected it with M. vindex and fixed.
|