Wikipedia:Peer review/Mudkip/archive1

Mudkip

I seriously need help, it was once on FAC, but as a result, it ended up failing, so i'll need help to get it to the appropriate status, cheers —M inun ^Spiderman 10:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section has still not been changed, as noted in its FAC. This issue needs to be corrected, as it'd be just like reading the intro for Torchic all over again. ♠ SG →Talk 14:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, according to the pokemon style guide, all Intro's are supposed to be like that.--A c1983fan^{(yell at me)} 14:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's right, but that's all the Mudkip article has. Take a look at Torchic and Bulbasaur, they have a third, original introduction paragraph, which Mudkip is lacking. I don't profess to be very knowledgable about Pokemon, though; I just like a little flavor in articles. ♠ SG →Talk 05:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 15:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]