Wikipedia:Peer review/Mediocre (album)/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've worked on it a little, and I feel it's almost ready to be upgraded to B-class status.
Thanks, – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 09:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.
- A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - there are a large number of Featured Articles on music albums at Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Music that may be useful.
Amazon.com is not a valid source for critical reviews - anyone can review there.
"No Vuelvo Más" is currently on both the "Los 40 Principales" and "México Top 100" charts, so the statistics may change every week. needs a ref or two, and articles should avoid words like "currently" (this may change tomorrow or next week). Use as of October 2008 or something similar.
I think the Critical reception section abuses block quotes - see a model FA article on how to do this better.
- Missing sections / information - needs
Recording and production,Style, other information, probably others, see a model article or two again
I'm not sure there's much information regarding recording and production. I'll start working on the style section. Thanks! – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 01:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I have just added a musical style section. – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 01:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I have also added a personnel section. – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 06:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)