Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/McLaren MP4-30/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see it become a Featured Article some day. It has been accepted as a Good Article and has had content included as part of a DYK in June. I am looking for anything that the article needs to make it viable as a Featured Article.

Thanks, Prisonermonkeys (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by MWright96

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • All images will need alt text per WP:ALT
    • The only images that do not have captions are included as multi-images; the captions apply to all images in the group.
  • Just a query, why are all the images all placed at right-hand side of the article?
    • That's just the way it has always been done in similar, related articles. I never really had a reason to question it.

Early development

[edit]
  • The FIA needs to be spelt out with the acronyms in brackets

Power unit — Honda RA615H

[edit]
  • "Honda introduced several radical concepts to the engine that allowed them to develop a smaller engine that weighed just 145 kg (320 lb)" -
  • reptition of engine
    • Fixed.
  • Remove the acronyms for kinetic entergy recovery system since its only used once in the article

In-season development

[edit]
  • Do the same for drag reduction system

Asian and American rounds

[edit]
  • Wikilink safety car for non-racing readers
    • Fixed.
  • "Pits" is slang. Reword to pit lane
    • Working on it.
  • Remove the wikilink for Felipe Massa on the second occassion he is mentioned
    • Fixed.
  • Do the same for Pastor Maldonado
    • Fixed.

References

[edit]
  • Ref 94 is missing the work
    • Fixed.
  • The work in Ref 121 has a second .com which needs removing
    • Fixed.
  • It would be a good idea to archive the sources to prevent link rot
  • Is F1 Today and This is F1 reliable sources?
    • I wasn't aware that they were being used. Will look into it.
    • Okay, they're fixed.

That is what I found. Overall a good work. MWright96 (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96 — updated as needed, others in progress. Thanks for the tips. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]