Wikipedia:Peer review/Lord of the Universe (documentary)/archive1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Lord of the Universe (documentary) was recently successfully passed and listed as a Good Article. The documentary film won the Alfred I. du Pont/Columbia University Award in Broadcast Journalism in 1974. The article cites twenty-five sources, and covers topics including content of the documentary, background on production, and reception. I am looking for comments from some fresh readers to the article and previously uninvolved editors, so I can get a new perspective on it and see what else can be done to improve the article's quality further. Thanks for taking the time to give it a read. Cirt 19:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC).
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 19:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-automated Peer Review
I will address points from the Semi-automated Peer Review, here below. Cirt (talk) 14:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC).
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?] -
Done - There was only one instance of this in the article, in the lead/intro, which I fixed. Cirt (talk) 14:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC). - Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?] - Done - I checked, it looks like all full-dates within the article itself are linked, but some within citations are not, I will get to linking those full-dates later, but I'd imagine this review point only applies to dates within the main article text. Cirt (talk) 14:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC).
- *Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 19:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC) -- I will continue to copyedit the article, and may also solicit help from some fresh readers to go through it for minor changes as well. Cirt (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC).
