Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Category 4 Pacific hurricanes/archive1

List of Category 4 Pacific hurricanes

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to bring it to featured list status but I would like some feedback first.

Thanks, HurricaneFan 25 16:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think photographs which are given above the list should be next to storm name in the list. As a example you can have a look at this article List of Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes. For the hurricanes which does not have their own page you can create redirects for the specific storm name/year links. The added benefit to this is on the list page, you can now use a shorter link name for each storm.--Vyom25 (talk) 08:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe such formatting is deprecated in FLs; the U.S. cities by population article, which is an FL, doesn't use that format, nor does any FL I know of. HurricaneFan 25 00:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Image captions that are complete sentances should take a full stop.
"During two fifteen-year periods from 1975 to 1989 and 1990 to 2004, an increase of thirteen Category 4 or 5 storms was observed." forgive me but I'm not sure, is that an increase of 13 in each period? Is there a reason why you wouldn't just say "During a 30-year period from 1975 to 2004"..?
Reworded to something different. HurricaneFan 25 00:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source(s) column need not be sortable.
I'm afraid I don't know how; can you tell me what code should be used?
Odd sorting going on with the Season column.
Use accessible symbols like {{dagger}} and {{double dagger}} rather than just a graphic which a screen-reader can't say.
Time column needs to be sorted correctly as well.
Page ranges in the references should use en-dash, not spaced hyphen (e.g. current ref 26).
Fixed the only one. HurricaneFan 25 00:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad effort at all though. Look forward to seeing it at WP:FLC. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments; all the others have been addressed. HurricaneFan 25 00:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]