Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Bay Area Rapid Transit stations/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am trying to nominate it for FLC. Any comments is welcomed, Thanks, —Chris! ct 19:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Eh..."/archive1"? —kurykh 20:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Read the notice at the top of the page please, specifically Individual peer reviews can be edited by following the edit section links next to the article titles, which are now stored on /archiveN pages from the very start (the term "archive" for these pages is purely historical). Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- I came here via a link on WikiProject page; if I knew there was a notice on the main page I wouldn't be so incredulous. Geez. —kurykh 05:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Read the notice at the top of the page please, specifically Individual peer reviews can be edited by following the edit section links next to the article titles, which are now stored on /archiveN pages from the very start (the term "archive" for these pages is purely historical). Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, Kurykh, do you have any comment regarding the list?—Chris! ct 20:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- The second paragraph in the lead seems unnecessary, as it's about the history of the lines rather than about stations. Otherwise, I think it's fine. But I'm not that into the FA process, so you can take my comments with a pinch of salt. —kurykh 00:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- If the lead is too short, then the FL people will probably complain. But I will take that into consideration. BTW, do you see any problem grammar wise? I am weak at noticing grammatical problem.—Chris! ct 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- No grammar problems that I can see. I don't think that the line names should have spaces between the
dashes (they should be dashes, not hyphens, but whatever)hyphens, but that's an optional change, I think. —kurykh 06:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)- Fixed. Anything else?—Chris! ct 17:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- No objections from me at the moment. Good job! —kurykh 21:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. Anything else?—Chris! ct 17:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- No grammar problems that I can see. I don't think that the line names should have spaces between the
- If the lead is too short, then the FL people will probably complain. But I will take that into consideration. BTW, do you see any problem grammar wise? I am weak at noticing grammatical problem.—Chris! ct 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- I removed the "The" from the first line.
- "the Richmond–Fremont Line was the oldest, first opened in September 1972" - That line was a bit awkward, so I've changed it.
- Did the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake close any lines or stations, and for how long?
- Um, not sure.—Chris! ct 02:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and rearranged the sections for the notes, citations, and bibliography. You may want to take a look at Harvey Milk to see ref groups for adding notes sections a different way.
- Make sure the images all have information tags, or at least include valid sources and are on commons.
- They are ok.—Chris! ct 02:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Mainly a bunch of minor things, I've tried to check against Wikipedia:Featured list criteria, but it may need someone with a good eye and knowledge for MoS issues. -Optigan13 (talk) 01:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)