Wikipedia:Peer review/Layered clothing/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to hear if there are any problems with it that'd make unrealistic its nomination as a Good Article.
Thanks, Skarkkai (talk) 09:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- There are no in-line references using {{cite web}} for example. I imagine it would be quick-failed for this alone.
- Not keen on the links which just head to the same article, only two lines lower (e.g. Inner layer).
- Why is some of the text in bold (e.g. Synthetic materials)? Doesn't need to be.
- Explain what PETE before using the abbreviation.
- A lot of claims in this article read like WP:OR e.g. "Silk feels more comfortable, but is weaker and harder to take care of, and is less commonly used. " - either reference this or reword to stay purely factual.
- " (UK company Buffalo" avoid these kind of links.
- Second EL appears to be bordering on advertising, giving undue weight to one manufacturer.