Wikipedia:Peer review/Kronosaurus/archive1

Kronosaurus

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

While waiting for Kronosaurus to be formally diagnosed using a proposed neotype specimen, I have decided to considerably expand the article. The use of the 2009 McHenry's thesis was very useful to me. I set myself the objective of proposing this article for proofreading so that it reaches the GA level, given that it is a fairly emblematic taxon of pliosaurs. If a redescription is published later, I could possibly upgrade it to FA level.

Thanks, Amirani1746 (talk) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

I suggest taking an article to WP:GA first before nominating it for FA, as a reviewer will give some helpful advice on how to improve the article. After reviewing this article, I do not see any major concerns and suggest that this be nominated at GAN. Z1720 (talk) 02:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and sorry for the delay Z1720. I do not intend to first propose the article to the GA because at the moment no neotype has been formally designated. However, the aim of an FA article is to treat the subject in its entirety. Amirani1746 (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]