Wikipedia:Peer review/Karmichael Hunt/archive4

Karmichael Hunt

I just want a last check up on this article before I nominate it for FA status. Recently passed A-class review. SpecialWindler talk 06:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 196 metres, use 196 metres, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 196 metres.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.^[?] Specifically, an example is 6 ft.
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.^[?]
The script has spotted the following contractions: isn't, didn't, Don't, isn't, won't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mcginnly | Natter 22:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't archive the review if hasn't been fully reviewed. If this peer review system can't get more than bot feedback, then it's not a peer review. SpecialWindler talk 06:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All I need is a little creative feedback before I put this up for FAC, Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpecialWindler (talk • contribs) 06:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]