Wikipedia:Peer review/José Rizal/archive1

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:KaElin (talk • contribs) .

Started and fixed nomination. AZ _t 14:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 14:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are some issues, I'm a little confused by what did with the footnotes, please follow WP:FN guideline. Regarding the prose, watch out for dragging on sentences. There quite a few long sentences with multiple use of commas. Back to footnotes, for such a long article it's undercited with some section containing no footnotes what-so-ever. Especially the quotes need footnotes. Anyway, it was an intresting read. Good luck with the article. - Tutmosis 22:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]