Wikipedia:Peer review/Forbidden Zone/archive1
Appearance
I completely revamped this article. Major, major changes have been made. A previous revision of the article has been described as being more like "a glowing review of the movie, not an encyclopedia article about it." I have fixed this. I think the current revision is very well-done, and I'd like to know what you folks think of what I've done with the article. (Ibaranoff24 05:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC))
A fairly good article, but the following changes should be implemented:
- In-line citations go after the punctuation (here they come exclusively before).
- Expand the lead and the Response subsection. Better yet, make Response into a new section by itself.
- There are some red links. You might want to create some stubs for these guys (though not all) to make the article look more visually appealing.
- The Plot section does not have any in-line citations, although I'm debating if this is a problem. The information included there does not seem to be controversial or something that might need to be sourced, with the possible exception of some quotes I found. I'll let you make the call on this one.
Overall though, nice start.UberCryxic 14:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
It looks better now that you've corrected the above problems, however the pictures need some work:
- The pic captioned "Frenchy goes into the Forbidden Zone" is appearing (at least in my browser--IE) offset to the right, next to another image.
- There are too many pictures in the history section. Consider removing 2-3 of them.
Nice work. SoberEmu 20:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)