Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Family (band)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article which I have worked on recently failed a good article nomination, because of several minor faults, and one major one: the extensive use of sources not thought to be reliable. However, this information I believe to probably be true and highly relevant to the article, but I do not know if it has been published in easily available reliable sources.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • For pop culture articles, I consider decent personal websites to be acceptable for verification and reading purposes, however they will impede any chances to progress the article in terms of good or featured article status. You would need to consider whether to sacrifice detail sourced to these sites to justify progressing the article through this process, or keeping the detail which you believe makes it a more informative article. Until better sources can be found, I would choose the latter option. It is still a good article for readers.-- Zleitzen(talk) 02:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Try looking for alternate sources that may be considered more reliable. Also, review the {{citeweb}} template which is commonly used for inline citations when going for GA / FA - improves GA / FA chances a lot this does. LuciferMorgan 11:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]