Wikipedia:Peer review/Enya/archive1

Enya

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 03:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a good article for the FA. It has all the references.

Thanks, Ineversigninsodonotmessageme (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Ineversigninsodonotmessageme[reply]

Here are my suggetions to improving the article:

References are not properly formatted per the MOS. Also all websites need an accessed date listed by them in the references.
At least one place has a space between the sentence period and the reference
Several places do not have sufficient inline reference (example: the part about what her parents did has no citation) and there are complete paragraphs without citations
The article has several citation needed tags that need references
The comment that Enya is a very private person seems rather subjective and not verifiable.

I don't think this is ready for FA status because a lot of statements need referencing. Biomedeng (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]