Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/David McDowall (criminologist)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know what other editors think needs to be added/improved before it can have a chance at becoming a GA.

Thanks, Everymorning (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I were reviewing this for GA, here's what I'd say.

  • The lead is too short -- it is supposed to summarize the article, per WP:LEAD. That in turn means that the body needs to include everything in the lead, which is also not the case right now.
  • The prose is fine; sources seems good, though I haven't checked to see if they support the information in the article.
  • Everything is cited.
  • It's neutral and seems to have no editorial bias.
  • It's stable.
  • No images, so no image problems.

The only remaining thing I'd look at for GA would be broadness of coverage. I did a little Googling and I don't see any obvious omissions. The article is short, but if you correct the lead issue I don't see any reason this wouldn't pass GA. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]