Wikipedia:Peer review/Calgary Hitmen/archive1

Calgary Hitmen

The first of two articles that I am working to get to Good Article status or better, I am primarally looking for comments on the prose of the team history sections, as that tends to be my weakest spot when editing articles. All suggestions are, of course, welcome. Thanks! Resolute 00:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move the awards won out of the lead
In spite of this, a group of eighteen investors, Perhaps just put eighteen investors or take out 'a group of'.
A source for the local media finding the voorhees logo violent
The logo in the infobox doesn't have a caption.
Images don't have fair use rationale, check Help:Image_page#Fair_use_rationale
Years alone should not be wikilinked

Goodluck with GA M3tal H3ad 01:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awards removed altogether, decided it was redundant. Reworded the investors part. Removed wikilinks on individual years. Years like "1998-99" are linked to the appropriate season page.

Four of the six images are user created and either licenced under GFDL or had copyright revoked, so I presume your comment on the images is specific to the logos. The main logo is shown to display the team at hand, while the other two are displayed to show the results of the controversy. I will try to reword the rationale on the image pages. Not sure I can caption the main logo as that is a limitation of the template. I'll have to think on that one.

The Calgary Sun article I linked (reprinted at brethart.com) mentioned that some media types were against the logo. Is this a case of my citation being poorly placed, or are you looking for an article from a specific journalist denouncing the logo?

Thank you for your comments. Resolute 05:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 21:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]