Wikipedia:Peer review/Bryan Adams discography/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Thanks, i want to see if its ready for FL. Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Laser brain comments
- Attention is needed to linking. Remove links like "1984" that don't do anything for the reader, and link (or explain) things like "platinum" and "diamond" certification at first mention.
- Terms like "breakthrough" album sound sensational and need sourcing.
- A lot of basic punctuation errors are present in the lead.. missing commas and apostrophes (ex. "... would be Adams first singles to chart in mainland Europe.").
- Footnotes should appear after commas if in mid-sentence for consistency with the rest of the article.
- "The follow up to Waking Up the Neighbours was 18 til I Die which wasn't able to match the sales of Waking Up the Neighbours." The language here is too informal. Suggest "which did not match the sales".
- I'm not sure how the text about his performances in Pakistan, etc is related to his discography. The lead is supposes to be a short bio
- In the Studio albums table, why do the footnotes appear under the chart number in the CAN column? That is not an accepted format for footnotes and it is not clear what the note belongs to.To make it more specific, The Rambling Man likes links to be specific
- In the Music videos table, you have a "Ref" column with an unclear purpose. Are those supposed to be citations? If so, what are they citing? If they are serving simply as links to where people can view the videos, that needs to be made clear. Readers have no idea why they are clicking those links.My other FL is like that --Laser brain (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)