Wikipedia:Peer review/Bishan MRT station/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel that it can be an A-class article, and I edited the article by closely comparing it to Dhoby Ghaut MRT station.
Thanks, Brachy08 (Let’s Have A Kiki, I Wanna Have a Kiki) 03:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Comments from Z1720
[edit]@Brachy0008: Not many projects have A-class designations anymore, but there is a featured article designation, which is the highest level an article can achieve on Wikipedia. Are you interested in going through that process with this article? Z1720 (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template.
- Since you are still working on nominating your first FA, I would suggest seeking a FA mentor. They can comment on this PR and guide you through the FAC process. Z1720 (talk) 02:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- The majority of the article was written by ZKang123; they should be consulted before a FAC nomination. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh boy erm... Tbh this article still needs A LOT of work in terms of citation formatting, image placements and prose style. While I guess there isn't much for material since I've researched as much as I could on this station, I find there is still quite some work on bringing this article to FA. ZKang123 (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Any ideas on how we can improve it further? Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 06:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh boy erm... Tbh this article still needs A LOT of work in terms of citation formatting, image placements and prose style. While I guess there isn't much for material since I've researched as much as I could on this station, I find there is still quite some work on bringing this article to FA. ZKang123 (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- The majority of the article was written by ZKang123; they should be consulted before a FAC nomination. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Closing note: Since this article has been nominated to FAC, I am going to close this PR (as a PR and FAC cannot be open at the same time.) Z1720 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
John M Wolfson
[edit]I'll reopen this peer review since the FAC closed fairly early on; if this is out of process feel free to move to a second PR archive as needed.
- Don't put citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE.
Bishan station (then named Kampung San Teng)
andat a Chinese cemetery
could stand to be copyedited.- Don't link countries or their demonyms per MOS:OVERLINK.
- Per the first point, don't mention the renaming to Bishan until it actually happens, refer to the station as "Kampung San Teng" until then.
- Any reason the name is Mandarin despite the burial ground having been Cantonese?
- The "Cultural impact" and haunting stuff can possibly be merged into station details, though also maybe not.
- Is the note that the Paranormal Investigators "investigate the supernatural" all that important/not self-explanatory?
That's all. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)