Wikipedia:Peer review/Bangkok/archive1
Appearance
I realize there are many things here to be improved or added before attaining good article status. Please post here to discuss the peer review request and to add things you feel need improvement. Thank you. Felixboy 14:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Overall the article seems a little on the brief side for a major city, particularly in the history and economics sections. You might take a look at the FA-rated city articles such as Bangalore, Boston, Massachusetts and Johannesburg for ideas on how it could be expanded. The introduction should be longer and there should be many more sources cited. It could use information on communications/media, geography, crime (although that is mentioned somewhat in the "Current Issues" section) and culture. The Hotels section could be expanded to cover tourism, since this is featured in the introduction.
- I hope this was helpful. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 14:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
The number of inhabitants in the article contradict
It is said that gdp is 220 million and gdp/head is 20000, suggesting 11 million inhabitants.
The article also mentiones 7,1 mil inhabitants and 8,1 mil inhabitants.