Wikipedia:Peer review/Avatar/archive1

This is a good article that can be improved.

It looks good overall and I don't see any major issues. In the last half of the "Teachings and significance" the prose is tending to drift from the neutral perspective a bit. For example, it asserts that "Aside Rama and Krishna there are many other human or animal forms which appeared on earth or elsewhere in the universe". This sort of statement needs to be qualified in terms of the religious beliefs. In the introduction it said there was a statement that "In any event, all Hindus believe that there is no difference between worship of Vishnu and His avatars as it all leads to Him". This is another global assertion that can not be proven. It might be better to say that "In any event, it is a tenet of Hindu faith that there is...". But that's just my 2 cents worth. Thanks. :) — RJH 17:40, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]