Wikipedia:Peer review/Ashley Giles/archive1
Appearance
I've listed this article for peer review because, after getting Marcus Trescothick to FA, MdCollins and I wanted to do the same to Giles' article. We have begun to outfit the article with more details but progress has stagnated slightly. Hopefully a peer review will highlight other areas to improve and help keep the momentum going. Aside from the section tagged with the expansion tag, what other issues are there?
Thanks,
SGGH speak! 12:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 06:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thankyou, I have addressed many of the points given. SGGH speak! 10:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)