Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Ars Conjectandi/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I'd really like to get this through a FAC - I realize it's rather short, but there isn't a whole lot to say on it. I've touched up the prose myself a bit, but I probably missed at least a few things, and other opinions are always welcome. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 18:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giggy

[edit]

Yeah, hope this helps a little. giggy (:O) 10:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from supposed stalker Kakofonous (talk · contribs)

  • At least a brief description of combinatorics, even though it is linked, would be helpful.
  • Overlinking throughout; please check.
  • I notice some inconsistency with dashes; you're even using an unspaced en dash not to indicate disjunction! Oh, the horror!
  • Check your quoting as well, the quotation marks are a bit unwieldy at the moment, at least according to our twisted MoS.
  • I'm a bit mystified as to why you put a complete reference in every ref tag, rather than just repeating them using <ref name="..."> ... <ref name="..."/>.
  • Pretty sure that "Hald, Anders (253), A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications Before 1750, Wiley, ISBN 978-0-471-47129-5" is a typo? The printing press wasn't invented for a long time after 253...
  • What are you talking about? I invented the printing press in 252! :o Fixed. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 23:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only a few comments, but every little bit helps, right? --Kakofonous (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RJHall

[edit]

Thanks.—RJH (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]