Wikipedia:Peer review/Archie Mafeje/archive1

Archie Mafeje

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because… it failed a GA nomination before. I have addressed all the points and looking to get feedback before the article get reviewed which typically takes months.

Thanks, FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Comments after a quick skim:

*"The "Mafeje Affair"" section has a lot of information that doesn't directly pertain to Archie Mafeje. I suggest that this be WP:SPINOUT and the section focus on Mafeje's actions.

*"The immediate aftermath" section might suffer from WP:OVERSECTION and perhaps the level 4 headings can be removed. *The formatting of the article is a little weird: I suggest swapping "Research and ideology" and "Personal life and death"

"After he passed away, his work gained wide attention and a growing interest from other scholars." How? the 3 references are for books about his idology

*Ref 88 needs to be expanded with more information. *Suggest archiving links with IABot here *Each note should have a citation.

I realised after I have started this review that this is open at GAN and PR at the same time. Per WP:PRG, a PR that is nominated for GAN is closed. Do you want to close this PR or the GAN? Z1720 (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 I removed the GA nomination at least until I can address your comments FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think making the mafeje affair a WP and summarise the relevant information in person page then? FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]