Wikipedia:Peer review/Albertosaurus/archive1
Appearance
Another dinosaur article here. This one is pretty well fleshed out and I do plan on having it become an FAC but I think it could probably use a little tune-up first (at least). I would like to hear your ideas on how to make the article more readable. Also, if there are any concepts presented that could be better explained, please say so. Thank you! Sheep81 09:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- A few more pictures would be nice --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 19:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. I will try to find some. Sheep81 19:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Added two pictures to the article just now. Sheep81 20:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. I will try to find some. Sheep81 19:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- The article goes on for some length explaining about Albertosaurus and other tyrannosaurs, without even briefly explaining what a tyrannosaur is, until the 'classification' section 1/3 down. A brief note, saying something like "...tyrannosaurs, which were..." might be in order.
- The pictures are nice. I like how one is just a photo of the area where the fossils have been found. Neat touch.--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I will try to work more info about tyrannosaurs into the lead. Sheep81 03:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
As all concerns were addressed as best I can tell, the article has now been sent to FAC. Please comment there if you wish. Thank you! Sheep81 09:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)